Tool or Process?

Mann mit weißem Shirt, der ein Macbook nutzt und verzweifelt ist

Videos and blog posts about „productivity systems“ are booming. That’s understandable, since they suggest a shortcut to improved productivity. But what counts is something else. The process is what matters most.

I stumbled across this video some time ago1. In this video August Bradley, photographer, introduces his „Notion Life Operating System“. Sounds impressive. It is. Anyone who is into apps and workflows will at least be in awe. Maybe even enthusiastic. At the same time, videos of this kind often have extremely high click numbers. I, too, like to watch something like this from time to time. Why?

I think this is due to a pleasant misunderstanding. Often it seems that just using a certain tool can be the key to achieving a set goal – a high level of productivity, for example. In our search for potential improvements to our own workflows, we then readily come across videos, blogposts or podcasts that focus on productivity. Usually, these posts come from people who are already extremely productive and/or successful. There we then see, hear or read about the holy grails of productivity. Systems with fancy-sounding names. Workflows that impress. Apps that make everything better. And since they are presented by people who have obviously already achieved a lot, the credibility is also given.

However, the problem is that we usually overlook the most important point: it’s not the tool that matters, it’s the process. In other words, the work you put into it. Of course, that’s much harder to show in a video. Who wants to watch you sitting at your desk, almost desperately working your way through that terribly complicated paper for two hours? What should a blog post look like that adequately reflects my writing process? This text here is a good example. I actually wanted to write something about Cal Newport’s concept of Deep Work, and probably will at some point – but in the last few days I didn’t feel like I had anything of my own to contribute to this topic. For a couple of days I was undecided whether to write an article at all, which would once again deal with some basic thoughts of mine about working. Or if I just don’t write a „light“ article. My list of potential blogposts is long, there are many apps. I ended up choosing this type of article, but had to torture myself a bit to start more than one section multiple times.

What is crucial?

But of course I can’t and don’t want to provide an commented version for each of my articles to show how much didn’t work out or at which points the writing wasn’t easy for me. First of all, that would be quite tiring and secondly, most people want to read solutions and not problems. And that is understandable, of course.

The problem is that people like August Bradley don’t succeed primarily because of the tool, but because of the processes behind it and the time they’ve invested in developing them. Someone who spends many hours mastering a tool like Notion or Obsidian has simply put in a lot of work and may be using basic strategies to be productive in his or her life in other ways as well.

I recently wrote about Obsidian here and I absolutely believe it’s a great tool that makes me more productive. But is it crucial? No. What’s crucial is that when I’m reading journals, I struggle through taking notes and then struggle through again to turn those fleeting notes into permanent ones. Obsidian makes a lot of things easier and gives me new options. But none of that would be worth anything if I didn’t do the work itself.

Reflection as a ground-laying process

But what are such fundamental strategies that underpin successful work? What do very productive people do differently than most others? That is, of course, far too big a question to answer here. One of these strategies that seems to me to be particularly important is reflection. By this, I mean constantly examining one’s own work. For me personally, there is probably no strategy that was and is more important than continuous reflection. This can come across as very unassuming, like a quick check-in in the evening to see how satisfied I was with various aspects of my life that day. Or it can be a whole day that I take maybe once every six months to review the past 6 months and set new goals.

Ultimately, it’s important that I take the time to reflect. Which tool I use for this is secondary.

How do you see it? How big a difference can the right tool make? Are strategies or processes more important? What are some basic strategies you’ve adopted over the years? I’d be happy to get into the conversation with others about this either in the comments or via email.

1 And with that together this discussion in the MPU forum.


Photo by Tim Gouw on Unsplash

Kommentare

5 Antworten zu „Tool or Process?“

  1. Avatar von Jochen Leeder

    I agree with you on every point, too often people talk about the tools without talking about the exact background. Books like built a better brain by Peter Holins and digital minimalism by Cal Newport are the key. For me It is important to get up with the idea of publishing something.

    1. Avatar von Jan Schaller
      Jan Schaller

      I haven’t read the first one but the second one is one of my all time favorites. And yes, writing, doing, publishing, refining is the key for me to get better.

  2. […] And that brings us right to the point and the last problem: the productivity trap. With all the nice apps, it’s easy to lose focus. I know this only too well from my own experience, that you suddenly spend hours on the new app and completely forget about the actual work. It’s also a good way to trick yourself, because it feels like work, but doesn’t really get you anywhere. At least not in the sense you intended. If you want to know what I mean, you can watch a video by August Bradley about his Notion System. I’ll leave it uncommented at this point. If you want to read more about it, you can do so in this article of mine that I published a good year and a half ago: Tool or Process?. […]

  3. […] I feel like I’m in a good place when it comes to apps. Over the years, I’ve been eliminating more and more construction sites in my workflow. Obsidian has certainly played the biggest part in that. In fact, the last major gap was the question of which read-later app I use. Here the answer seems to be found with Readwise Reader. I was only surprised to switch to Arc and thus a new browser. At least for now. We’ll see if this switch becomes permanent, or if I go back to Safari sooner or later. In any case, I’m looking forward to working with my tools again in 2023, because one thing is clear anyway: You have to do the work yourself, no matter how good the tools are. […]

  4. […] All of this prompted me to look for a new browser, since I have to assume that Arc will simply be abandoned at some point. Of course, I could also just use Safari. And it’s good to know that I have this fallback option. But Safari is also somewhat boring, and since I’m currently between different projects, I once again have time and opportunity to engage with my tools. […]

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert